1. Type of Peer Review
All manuscripts submitted to this journal undergo an initial screening by the editorial board. Those that pass the initial assessment are sent for review to two independent and expert reviewers in the relevant field. The peer review process is conducted as a Double-Blind Peer Review, meaning that the identity of the author(s) is concealed from the reviewers, and the identity of the reviewers is concealed from the author(s).
2. Number of Reviewers
Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers who have no affiliation with the journal's editorial board.
3. Peer Review Timeline
The estimated time required for the peer review process, from submission to the initial decision, is approximately 4 to 6 weeks. Authors may track the status of their manuscripts through the journal's online submission system.
4. Evaluation Criteria and Decision
Manuscripts are evaluated based on the following criteria:
The final decision regarding acceptance, rejection, or revision is made by the Editor-in-Chief based on the reviewers' recommendations.
5. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy
In accordance with the best practices recommended by DOAJ:
6. Content Subject to Peer Review
All submitted research articles are subject to peer review, with the exception of editorial notes and non-research content that are clearly marked as such. All peer-reviewed content, including guest-edited special issues, adheres to the same rigorous review standards.